| More
Home / Animal Rights / Headlines


March 24, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


HSUS Seafood 'Boycott' Smells Fishy

When is a boycott not a boycott? When animal rights zealots at the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) organize it. Last night Canada's Global National television network broadcast a nationwide report based on the Center for Consumer Freedom's investigation of HSUS's Canadian seafood "boycott." HSUS has claimed that over 200 American restaurants and fish companies are no longer buying Canadian seafood in protest of that nation's unrelated seal hunt. But among the 87 supposed "boycotters" we contacted, a whopping 78 percent said either that they were selling Canadian seafood, or that they never served it in the first place.

Reporting on the phony boycott, Global National Washington bureau chief Troy Reeb talked to several seafood businesses in our nation's capital. The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, a Washington landmark mentioned prominently as a Canadian seafood boycotter in an HSUS press release this week, told Reeb flatly: "We don't do boycotts." HSUS has since quietly altered its own press release.

Still listed in that press release as boycotters, however, are Washington's Ardeo Restaurant and Legal Sea Foods, both of which (as Global National reported) had Canadian seafood on the menu just yesterday. When confronted with the fact that at least one restaurant on his "boycott" list was a vegetarian establishment that never served fish to begin with, HSUS president Wayne Pacelle conceded: "Well, I'm not sure ... there are certain restaurants that signed up because of their enthusiasm for the campaign." (Click here for the video.)

If enthusiasm -- not actual participation -- is the measure of an animal-rights boycott, HSUS may actually have something here. But just 13 percent of the restaurants and seafood companies that we contacted (from HSUS's list) are putting their menu where Pacelle's mouth is. The next time HSUS weighs in, be it about food, clothing, entertainment, medical research, or conservation, it will be helpful to remember that our experience suggests the group can be trusted about 13 percent of the time.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • PETA (Still) Kills Animals. Lots of ‘Em.
    Posted On: Friday 3/12/2010
  • Every Dog Has Its Day…in Court?
    Posted On: Friday 3/5/2010
  • Yes, Wayne, Let’s Follow the Money
    Posted On: Tuesday 2/23/2010
  • Federal Racketeering Lawsuit Stuns HSUS
    Posted On: Monday 2/22/2010
  • All Systems Go for HumaneWatch!
    Posted On: Tuesday 2/16/2010
  • HumaneWatch: Proudly Launching Soon
    Posted On: Monday 2/15/2010
  • The Winter of Wayne’s Discontent
    Posted On: Wednesday 2/10/2010
  • Attack Dog
    Posted On: Tuesday 2/9/2010


  • Activist Cash

    Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    While PCRM presents itself as a doctor-supported, unbiased source of health guidance, the group’s own literature admits that 95 percent of its members have no medical degrees. read more here »

    People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, human beings are just another animal species, no more special or important than a snail darter or dairy cow. read more here »

    OpEds

    Should we go vegetarian for the holiday feast?
    This year some Americans have little to be thankful for, other than the simple pleasure of enjoying their holiday meals. read more here »

    Hard-boiled animal activists could threaten vaccine supply
    In the post-9/11 world, the phrase "national security" conjures up images of dirty bombs, jihadists, white powder and biohazard labels. It should also bring to mind another picture: an egg. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.