Home / Livestock Farming / Headlines


December 5, 2008
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Proposed Fees Would Hog-Tie Livestock Farmers

Proposed Fees Would Hog-Tie Livestock Farmers

This issue would be funny if it weren’t so frustrating: A federal proposal to charge fees for air pollution caused by burping and tooting barnyard animals could put many farmers out of business. And not surprisingly, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is just fine with that.

The newest and craziest idea from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) comes after a U.S. Supreme Court judgment last year that counts flatulence from hogs and cattle as greenhouse-gas emissions. The livestock tax would penalize farms and ranches that own more than 25 dairy cows, 50 beef cattle, or 200 hogs by making them pay a yearly fee of $175 for each dairy cow, $87.50 for every beef cattle, and $20 per pig. The measure would cost even a midsize farm up to $40,000 annually and has the potential to bankrupt most family-owned businesses.

Naturally, PETA is A-OK with the idea. The Associated Press reports:

While farmers say it would drive them out of business, an organization supporting the proposal hopes it forces the farms and ranches to switch to healthier crops.

"It makes perfect sense if you are looking for ways to cut down on meat consumption and recoup environmental losses," said Bruce Friedrich, a spokesman in Washington for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

This sounds a lot like the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and its full-throated endorsement of Proposition 2, the ballot initiative that just passed in California forcing chicken farmers to comply with unreasonable and costly caging rules. But what it really means is that egg producers will have to close down or set up shop out of state to avoid going broke. That was HSUS’s real agenda – to put so-called chicken oppressors out of business. 

Like Proposition 2, the EPA proposal will force hard-working ranchers to close up shop while doing nothing to help animals. So why are PETA and HSUS involved? These initiatives drive up the cost of meat, leading people to eat less of it. Bruce Friedrich from PETA just admitted as much. Penalizing farmers for doing their job and providing America with the meat we love is merely a ruse that animal-rights activists are supporting for their own fringe agenda, and it’s time everyone recognized these campaigns for what they are. 

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Sucker, Can You Spare a Dime (for HSUS)?
    Posted On: Tuesday 11/17/2009
  • Exposing the Animal Rights Agenda
    Posted On: Friday 11/13/2009
  • The Bacon Beckoning
    Posted On: Thursday 11/12/2009
  • Vegetarian Book Makes Meatless Arguments
    Posted On: Thursday 11/5/2009
  • Cracking the Shell of Animal Rights Activism
    Posted On: Monday 10/26/2009
  • Meet the Animal Rights Movement’s Rich Aunt
    Posted On: Thursday 10/22/2009
  • PETA Stunts Are Still Trashy
    Posted On: Wednesday 10/14/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Sierra Club
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Sierra Club has become an anti-growth, anti-technology group that puts its utopian environmentalist vision before the well being of humans. read more here »

    Howard Lyman
    Background
    A successful Montana cattle rancher for nearly four decades, Howard Lyman sold his farm in 1983 and became a professional lobbyist for the Montana Farmers Union and the National Farmers Union, promoting the passage of the National Organic Standards Act. read more here »

    OpEds

    Pig Farmers Akin to Terrorists? HOGWASH.
    RFK Jr. dishes out a healthy portion of hog farming hysteria accompanied by demands for costly regulations. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.