| More
Home / Op-Eds


Posted On September 27, 2009
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Lifestyle Taxes All Fizz, No Substance

By: J. Justin Wilson
Newspaper: South Florida Sun-Sentinel

Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through "lifestyle taxes" on soft drinks.

However, evidence demonstrates that arbitrary taxes will not reduce health care costs, as supporters claim. Rather, lifestyle taxes represent just another "get rich quick" scheme by Congress.

The sudden rise of beverage tax endorsements is rooted in a "for your own good" social engineering dogma that injects the government further into vending machines, liquor cabinets and, ultimately, our private lives. It's the kind of politics that thinks your decisions about what to eat and drink are better left to a few self-appointed activist groups in Washington.

The tax code shouldn't be a tool for punishing companies who make beverages that some people choose to consume. Nor should it be an instrument for penalizing individuals who make "bad" food choices.

Here's what proponents of these lifestyle taxes aren't telling you: Taxing soft drinks isn't going to cure America's obesity "epidemic."

There's not a single compelling study that suggests taxing sodas at the level being discussed affects levels of obesity. An analysis this year concluded that, to actually make a dent in the obesity rate, Congress would need a 1,200 percent tax on soda. That means a 75-cent can of soda would be taxed $9. (Better hope the vending machine takes $10 bills.)

One group leading the soda tax crusade is the Center for Science in the Public Interest, champions of the government-knows-best attitude. CSPI's leader, Food Police Chief Michael Jacobson, testified before a U.S. Senate committee in May in favor of soda taxes. CSPI is looking to the government to raid your fridge, and not in a good way. Consider that, in the past, Jacobson has endorsed taxes on meat, butter, cheeses and whole milk.

Today, it's taxes on soda; tomorrow it's the rest of your pantry (or beer fridge).

Americans know a scam when they see one. Along with widespread opposition to a soda tax, over 70 percent oppose such taxes on high-calorie foods, with half of respondents strongly disapproving.

It's time to slam the door on the food cops before they get their foot in it. These taxes need to be stopped before they begin, or the only barrier between the government and our personal choices will be a politician's imagination.




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

OpEds

‘Tis not the season to be annoyingly wary
This time of year, people watching their weight while facing down holiday happy hours and open houses can be particularly susceptible to scaremongering by the fat police. read more here »

Food activists are all jeer, no cheer
Don't let the holiday season magic be tainted by activists' food curses. One thing we can be thankful for is our ability to ignore them. read more here »

Letters

Mercury’s ill effects overstated
The well-documented health benefits of consuming fish far outweigh any hypothetical health risks. It's time that fish regained its old reputation as "brain food." read more here »

There Goes the Neighborhood
When the animal-rights people at PETA announce where they'll set up shop in Los Angeles, their new neighbors may want to take a few precautions. read more here »

'Animal rights' goes too far
I'd like to correct some erroneous information presented in a recent Sun-Times editorial about my organization and its position on the treatment of animals. read more here »


Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.